Recent coverage of the San Francisco 49ers’ substation controversy has tried to collapse the entire issue into one reassuring line: team officials said an independent scientist found field levels were “400 times less than an unsafe zone,” so the matter is over. That is a public-relations answer, not a scientific one. Public reports say John […]
Monthly Archives: April 2026
For decades, the wireless-safety argument has been trapped in the wrong frame. The public keeps being asked to look for a single clean line from radiofrequency exposure to one disease, as if RF were supposed to behave like a poison with one target organ and one obvious clinical signature. But that is not how the […]
The emerging case against chronic radiofrequency exposure is no longer confined to a single endpoint. Cancer remains the most politically difficult outcome to ignore, but the deeper argument is that the injury may begin much farther upstream, at the level of voltage sensing, ion timing, oxidative balance, and mitochondrial control. When the disturbance is that […]
Europe has plenty of old things. Old empires. Old churches. Old names. But the Basque Country, straddling northern Spain and southwestern France at the western end of the Pyrenees, preserves something rarer than age: nonconformity. It kept Euskara, a language isolate with no known living relatives. And it kept unusually high RhD-negative blood-group frequencies—high enough […]
There is now high-certainty evidence from experimental animal studies that radiofrequency radiation increases the risk of cancer and harms reproductive outcomes. That conclusion alone should have forced a major policy response. But the science did not stop there. A new 2026 risk-assessment paper now shows that the exposure limits governments still rely on are not […]
- 1
- 2