QuantaDose Press Releases

Once you admit there is risk, the direction stops being optional

If you accept:

  • Non‑thermal RF effects are real and biologically plausible (S4–Mito–Spin).

  • The best animal data show carcinogenicity with non‑linear dose–response, with tumours still appearing around 0.1 W/kg in Ramazzini’s far‑field work.

  • A federal court has already said the FCC’s “no need to update 1996 limits” decision was arbitrary and capricious. IEEE Standards Association+2IEEE 802+2

Then the logical conclusion is:

Modern microwave‑based wireless does not come free. For children and for chronic use, it is a real environmental exposure, not a neutral convenience.

Once you accept that, you really only have two choices:

  1. Keep pretending and absorb the health cost.

  2. Keep the good parts of connectivity but change the carrier.

That’s where the endgame comes in.

2. The endgame: move the burden from microwaves to light

The only way to keep “wireless convenience” and remove the chronic microwave burden indoors is to push the last hop of connectivity onto light:

  • Li‑Fi / light communications carry data on modulated photons instead of microwaves.

  • The new IEEE 802.11bb standard (ratified 2023) already defines the physical layer and architecture for light‑based WLANs that interoperate with Wi‑Fi — effectively giving us an official, interoperable Li‑Fi path. Everything RF+7Wikipedia+7pureLiFi+7

Light has the properties we want for children’s environments:

  • It does not penetrate opaque walls, so a classroom or bedroom can be a contained cell.

  • It can reach very high data rates (multi‑Gbps) and excellent latency.Wikipedia

  • It naturally aligns with short‑range, indoor, “Internet of Things” devices.

So the endgame, stated plainly, is:

Indoors, the Internet of Things and high‑bandwidth links should ride on light, not microwaves.
RF becomes mostly infrastructure and backhaul, not the constant background in children’s bedrooms.

Concretely, that means:

  • Mandating Li‑Fi compatibility (802.11bb or successors) in new access points, phones, laptops, tablets, and IoT gear over a transition period.

  • Requiring that indoor fixed devices default to light when available (just as devices today prefer Wi‑Fi over cellular when possible).

  • Using microwave and millimetre‑wave RF primarily outdoors and in transit — where distance and building materials already attenuate exposure.

3. Pushing RF away from kids: infrastructure and space

Once indoor links move to light, we can redesign RF infrastructure around distance and shielding, instead of stuffing radios into every classroom ceiling.

That means:

  • Let macro towers and rooftop sites handle wide‑area coverage, with building roofs and walls doing what they naturally do: attenuate microwave energy into indoor spaces.

  • Where capacity demands it, use space‑based or high‑altitude platforms to carry traffic over regions, so the densest parts of the RF field are literally off the ground and away from day‑care centres and bedrooms.

  • Use directional antennas, beamforming, and building‑aware siting so that RF energy is shaped for outdoor coverage and transit — not pushed through walls to reach devices that could easily be using light instead.

RF doesn’t disappear in this model. It becomes:

  • The spine and skeleton of mobility and long‑range connectivity.

  • Something you cross occasionally, not something bathing children 24/7 where they sleep.

4. RF Safe’s Li‑Fi work: the template, not just a product

On top of generic Li‑Fi, RF Safe has already sketched what a best‑case, health‑aligned light network looks like:

  • U.S. Patent US11700058B2 covers a system for wireless communication using Far‑UVC light, where the light both carries data and actively inactivates airborne and surface pathogens. RF Safe+6Google Patents+6RF Safe+6

  • In “BioDefense Mode,” those Far‑UVC Li‑Fi nodes create zones that are:

    • Zero‑SAR (no microwave carrier at all in the last hop), and

    • Continuously germicidal, improving infection‑control in schools, hospitals, and workplaces.

It’s not just “another gadget.” It’s an existence proof that:

  • We can have high‑speed indoor wireless

  • With no microwave burden

  • And with added public‑health functions that RF can never provide.

That’s what the endgame looks like if you push the logic all the way through.

5. How to talk about the roadmap in one breath

Putting it together, you can update the “direction of travel” message like this:

  1. Now:

    • Treat RF as a credible long‑term risk, especially for kids.

    • Cut duty cycle and proximity; use physics‑correct tools (like TruthCase) that shield you without making the phone transmit harder.

  2. Law and oversight:

    • Enforce Public Law 90‑602 so HHS actually runs the electronic product radiation control program it’s already mandated to run.

    • Move RF health standards to HHS/EPA, keep FCC on spectrum.

    • Repeal or fundamentally repair Section 704 so communities can consider health when siting antennas.

  3. Endgame technology:

    • Mandate Li‑Fi/light‑communications compatibility (802.11bb and successors) in indoor infrastructure and IoT.

    • Require that indoor devices prefer light over RF when available.

    • Push microwaves out to infrastructure and space, so roofs and walls shield children by default.

    • Use advanced Li‑Fi architectures — including Far‑UVC “BioDefense Mode” networks — as the model for what “clean ether” really means.

One tight way to say it:

The science says RF is not free. The law we need already exists (Public Law 90‑602); the gag that stops communities acting is Section 704. The only coherent endgame is to stop using microwaves as the last hop indoors and move the burden onto light. That means Li‑Fi by default for the Internet of Things, microwaves reserved for infrastructure and space, and a regulatory framework that finally lines technology up with biology instead of pretending 1996 never ended.